ONE of our great difficulties in understanding Scripture comes
about through our unwillingness or inability to distinguish between the relative and the
absolute1. Because of this, we come up against seeming
contradictions, and the general tendency is to accept the relative rather than the
absolute. Both are true, but in different circumstances, and it is necessary that we
should take these differing circumstances into account.
For
example, let us note that the Scriptures speak of Abel, Lot, Zechariah, Joseph (husband of
Mary) and Joseph of Arimathea (and others) as being just or righteousthe
word is the same in the Greekyet Paul is emphatic in declaring that Not one is
just, not even one for All sinned and are wanting of the glory of God
(Rom.3:10,23). How can both of these conditions be true? The answer is that the first is
relative while the second is absolute.
The
righteousness of each of the men we have mentioned is being judged against a particular
set of circumstances operative at the time he lived. The righteousness of Abel, for
instance, is in connection with the oblation which he made to God, and is in contrast to
the unrighteousness of Cain in respect to his offering. Lot was righteous in respect to
his witness to God in Sodom, and to his keeping aloof from the general wickedness
prevailing in the city. Zechariah was without blame in the manner in which he conducted
his priestly office, as distinct from the generally corrupt priesthood of his day, of
which Ananias and Caiaphas were later examples. But none of these righteous men was
completely without sin in his life, for when Paul contemplates the whole of humanity
against the background of the absolute righteousness of God, he makes no exceptions, but
finds them all wanting. Not one is just, not even one . . . all sinned and are
wanting of the glory of God.

THE WORD OF THE CROSS
It
is the apostle Paul who consistently proclaims the absolute; the other writers of
Scripture generally confine themselves to the relative. This is because it is Paul alone
who speaks of the Word of the Cross (1 Cor.1:18), and until this truth is
proclaimed, the absolute cannot even be revealed, let alone understood. Indeed, it is not
until after his preaching of the Cross that Paul can even mention the purpose of God,
which has a culmination that is gloriously absolute, for the end of Gods purpose is
that He may be All in all.
It
is generally accepted that the Corinthian letters, and also Galatians, were written before
Romans. In Corinthians, the word of the cross is declared to be, to us who are being
saved, the power of God, and this links up with Romans 1:16, where Paul
proclaims an evangel which is Gods power for salvation. In this evangel,
a righteousness of God is being revealed, and this righteousness is so
absolute that it makes all humanity unrighteous. All sinned and are wanting of the
glory of God. From this, it follows immediately that no one can justify or save
himself; in Pauls evangel the righteousness to which all believers attain is not
acquired through works, but by faith alone. It is a righteousness of God through
Jesus Christs faith, for all, and on all who are believing (Rom.3:22), and
bestowed upon them gratuitously (that is, without any cause in themselves that
would enable them to lay claim to it). Works are completely excluded, for Paul reckons
a man to be justified by faith apart from works of law. Indeed, he declares
that by works of law, no flesh at all shall be justified in His (Gods) sight,
for through law is the recognition of sin (Rom.3:19-28).
In
the writings of James, on the contrary, justification is by works. In the relative context
of the kingdom evangel this is perfectly true. James writes to those who are still under
the law (and have, therefore, not yet come to the cross of Christ), for he says, For
anyone who should be keeping the whole law, yet should be tripping in one thing, has
become liable for all (Jas.2:10). But Paul writes to those who are free from
the law (Gal.3:21-25). It is the very liability of humanity to trip that makes it
impossible for a law to be given which can vivify, and which can produce that absolute
righteousness which satisfies God. The fault is not in the law, for the law, indeed,
is holy, and the precept holy and just and good (Rom.7:12), but in the inability of
humanity to keep it. Therefore, the promise has to be out of Jesus Christs
faith, for He alone could keep the law. Now God is able to manifest, apart from
law, a righteousness of His own through Jesus Christs faith, and to bestow it
freely upon all who believe.
The
law can only produce a relative righteousness, for no one can keep the law to perfection.
Those who strive to do so may be described as just, in contrast to their
fellows who do not endeavor to keep it. They may even be described as becoming
blameless, as Paul so pictured himself in Philippians 3:6, yet elsewhere he
designates himself as a calumniator and a persecutor and an outrager and
the foremost of sinners (1 Tim.1:13-15). The righteousness which is in law is
actually one of the things which he deems to be forfeit because of Christ. This is the
distinction between the relative and the absolute.
We
may perhaps illustrate this by reference to sunspots. These are really masses of brilliant
flame, but against the absolute brilliance of the sun itself, they appear as dark spots on
the suns surfacehence the name that is given to them. Against any other
background, they would appear as luminaries, not spots. And so it is when the
righteousness of God is revealed, as it is in Pauls evangel. Much that appeared
before to be righteous, now assumes a different complexion when seen against the glory of
Gods own righteousness.

THE WILL AND PURPOSE OF GOD
In
the letters of Paul, the absolute is consistently being proclaimed, for in them we are
introduced to a God Who is seen to be operating all in accord with the counsel of
His will (Eph.1:11). Can anything be more absolute than this? Though in
other parts of Scripture, men may appear to have a free choice (for example, Joshua is
recorded as saying, Choose you this day whom you will serve . . . as for me and my
house, we will serve the Lord Joshua 24:15), here in this scripture it is made clear
that every choice that men may appear to have is, in reality, subservient to the absolute
will of God. And it is in this context that God can speak of a purpose of the
eonsthat is, a purpose which spans the whole of the eonsfor such a
purpose, to be effective, presupposes the absoluteness of the will of God. Nothing is ever
allowed to thwart Him, even for an instant. This makes Gods purpose itself absolute,
and so Paul is able to refer to it with the definite article, the purpose of the
eons, the purpose of the One Who is operating all in accord with the
counsel of His will.
Let
us then briefly see how Paul presses home the absolute. In the matter of salvation, for
example, whereas the teaching in other parts of Scripture is that He that shall
endure to the consummation, the same shall be saved, with Paul the teaching is,
God wills that all mankind be saved, and come into a realization of the
truth and We rely on the living God, Who is the Saviour of all mankind
(1 Tim.2:4 and 4:10).
James
makes works a requisite of salvation (James 2:14-26), yet Paul speaks of salvation as
being entirely in grace, and not out of us at all not of works lest
anyone should be boasting. In Pauls evangel, we contribute nothing to our
salvation, but find ourselves to be entirely Gods achievement (Eph.2:8-10).
In
other matters, Paul is equally emphatic. If we want an absolute expression of subjection,
we find it in 1 Corinthians 15:20-28, where Paul goes to some pains to point out that, in
the final analysis, only God Himself may be excluded from those who are to be made subject
to His Son. This of necessity, includes the Adversary, who in other parts of Scripture is
given some measure of control and influence. It also far exceeds the relative dominion
given to man in Genesis 1:28-31 and Psalm 8:4-8. Even when this is enlarged in Hebrews
2:5-8, we still do not see all subject to Him.
Again,
if we want an absolute expression of vivification, we find it in 1 Corinthians 15:22. For
even as, in Adam, all are dying, thus also, in Christ, shall all be vivified. In other
parts of Scripture, vivification is relative. For even as the Father is rousing the
dead and vivifying, thus the Son also is vivifying whom He will (John
5:21). In Revelation 20:6 it is only those who have part in the former resurrection, and
whose names, consequently, are written in the scroll of life, on whom the second death has
no jurisdiction.

THE DEITY AND THE ALL
The
tendency, mentioned earlier, to accept the relative rather than the absolute, often means
that we fail to give full value to the absolute when we come up against it. Nowhere has
this been more frequently demonstrated than in the text quoted in the last paragraph (1
Cor. 15:22). The words of Scripture have been twisted in the minds of many sincere
believers to read, For even as, in Adam, all are dying, thus also shall all in
Christ be vivified. This would limit vivification to the believers of today.
No, the all in the second half of the comparison is just as comprehensive as
the all in the first part. In Adam ALL are dying; in Christ ALL will be
vivified. Unless this is the true meaning, Christs sacrifice becomes, in part,
unavailing.
Others,
while accepting the all-embracing nature of the word all, have questioned the
true meaning of the word vivify (or make alive in the King James
Version). They have qualified it to mean rouse from the dead, with the
possibility of dying again, as Lazarus was roused. But in the context of the whole passage
from verse 20 to verse 28, which begins with the rousing of Christ from the dead and ends
with God being All in all, and includes within it the final destruction of death itself,
such a restriction of meaning of the word vivify is not admissible. The basis
of comparison is Christs own rousing from the dead. We know that He dies no more,
hence neither do those who are vivified in Him.
A
similar reluctance to give full value to the absolute is seen in the common interpretation
of the passage in 1 Timothy 2:4, God wills that all mankind be saved. In the
minds of many, the overriding will of God is reduced to a wish or a desire, in part
dependent upon the wills of mankind, the thought being that God will have all men to
be saved, if they will only let Him. How far short is this from the truth of
Scripture, and how detracting from the conception of the deity of God, Whom Paul declares
to be The Saviour of all mankind, especially of those who believe!
Many would make Him the Saviour only of those who believe.
People
who think in this way, would also, of necessity, put a restriction on the absolute
expression of reconciliation as found in Colossians 1:20, where no being in the whole
universe is excluded. God is making peace with all, both in heaven and earth, through the
blood of Christs cross.
The
whole passage of Colossians 1, verses 15 to 20, is full of expressions that are absolute,
both in the field of creation and in the field of reconciliation. Notice how frequently
the word all occurs, and how, in three cases, it is expanded to make it quite
clear that nothing is to be left out. In our quotation of the scripture, we have put the
word all in capitals, to bring it out, and have shown the three expansions in
italics.
Who
is the Image of the invisible God, Firstborn of every creature, for in Him is ALL created,
that in the heavens and that on the earth, the visible and the invisible, whether
thrones, or lordships, or sovereignties, or authorities, ALL is Created through Him
and for Him, and He is before ALL, and ALL has its cohesion in Him.
And
He is the Head of the body, the ecclesia, Who is Sovereign, Firstborn from among the dead,
that in ALL He may be becoming first, for in Him the entire complement delights to
dwell, and through Him to reconcile ALL to Him (making peace through the blood of His
cross), through Him, whether those on the earth or those in the heavens.
A
parallel scripture, but with a vital difference, is Romans 11:36, Seeing that out of
Him and through Him and for Him is ALL: to Him be the glory for the eons! Amen!
The
vital difference between this passage and the one in Colossians lies in the phrase
out of Him. The scripture in Romans refers to God Himself; the one in
Colossians refers to the Son of His love. All is out of God, and through Him and for Him;
all is through Christ and for Him. Such is the oneness between God and His Son that the
through and the for can be attributed to both; but by the nature
of the case, the out of must refer to the Father only.
In
this passage in Romans, the word all is used only once, but it is an absolute
expression. Whatever is out of God is for Him at the ultimate, and is
through Him during the intervening period. Nothing gets lost on the way, but
is safely brought through all the disruptive factors of the eons until it finds its place
in that most absolute of all scriptural expressions, That God may be ALL in
ALL.
Dare
we here limit the completeness of the first ALL? Can we limit the comprehensiveness of the
second ALL? If we seek to limit either, we cast doubts on the other.

THE WORD OF GOD COMPLETED
Wherever
we turn in Pauls writings, we find them full of absolutes. That is because he was
the one appointed to complete the Word of God (Col.1:25). We note a few more:
Nothing,
consequently, is now condemnation to those in Christ Jesus (Rom.8:1).
Blessed
is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who blesses us with EVERY spiritual
blessing among the celestials, in Christ (Eph.1:3).
. . . and subjects ALL under HIS feet, and gives Him, as Head over ALL, to the ecclesia
which is His body, the complement by which ALL in ALL is being completed
(Eph.1:22,23).
Wherefore,
also, God highly exalts Him, and graces Him with the name that is above EVERY name, that
in the name of Jesus EVERY knee should be bowing, celestial and terrestrial and
subterranean, and EVERY tongue should be acclaiming that Jesus Christ is Lord, for the
glory of God, the Father (Phil.2:9-11).
Let
us conclude this particular article by looking again at Romans 8, from verse 28, Now
we are aware that God is working ALL together for the good of those who are loving
God, who are here defined as those who are called according to His purpose. Actually
their calling is the middle stage of their spiritual experience, as outlined in these
verses. Before they were called, they were foreknown and predesignated, and after their
calling they are justified and glorified. Where, in any of these stages, do any fall away?
Where is there any room for failure when God is working ALL together for their good? Any
suggestion of this kind immediately casts doubt on the foreknowledge of God, and on His
ability to carry through to the end what He has designated beforehand in accord with His
purpose.
How
shall He not, together with Him, also be graciously granting US ALL? (Rom.8:32).
For
I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor messengers, nor sovereignties, nor the
present, nor what is impending, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other
creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus, our
Lord (Rom.8:38,39).
What
a glorious absolute this is! When asking the question, in verse 35, What shall be
separating us from the love of God in Christ Jesus? Paul lists seven things which
are grievous in themselves, but are the common lot of many in humanity. He deals with them
quickly by saying that in ALL these we are more than conquering through Him Who
loves us. They are all the outcome of mans own inhumanity to man, and we are
granted the strength to deal with these through our faith in God, Who gives us so many
evidences of His love for us.
But
then Paul goes on to list a series of nine other things which are outside of
humanitys control, and then, just in case anything in the wide universe has been
omitted, he adds a tenth, nor any other creation, and gives us an
assurance that not one of these, nor all combined, will be able to separate us from
the love of God in Christ Jesus, our Lord.
Paul
can only say this because the power of the Deity is absolute, and because God is ever true
to Himself. Let our appreciation of the deity of God enhance this assurance in our hearts.
-
1 The dictionary defines absolute
as unconditional and unlimited and relative as having relation
to something else. For the purposes of this study, we may regard absolute
as that which is in accord with, or depends solely upon, the Deity, and in which no other
factors may intrude. Thus the deity of God will be stressed in every mention of the
absolute.
|